From Clarity to Action: The Consultant’s Role and the Final Two Thinking Models

by | May 29, 2026 | Consulting, Tools & Assessments | 0 comments

We began this series about the consultant’s role in uncertain times by asking a deceptively simple question: what is uncertainty, really? In Part 1, we found that it lives at the intersection of ambiguity, unpredictability, and the human need for control — and that it disguises itself as prudence. Read Part 1 of 3, When the Ground Shifts: Recognizing Uncertainty in Your Client’s Organization

In Part 2, we looked at the consultant’s role in those moments, and introduced two models for restoring clarity: separating what can be controlled from what cannot, and shifting clients from prediction to preparation. Read Part 2 of 3, Steady in the Storm: The First Two Thinking Models

Before we move to our final two models, here is what you shared in response to Part 2:

“The two-column exercise (what we can’t control; what we can control) is something I now use in almost every strategic planning session. The shift in the room when people realize how much IS in their control is remarkable.”

“I’ve been doing scenario planning for years but calling it a “readiness plan” rather than a forecast completely changed how my clients received it.”

What I hear in your responses — and in my own experience — is that the language we use with clients matters as much as the frameworks themselves. When we frame a tool as a thinking aid rather than a prediction machine, resistance drops and engagement rises. Keep that in mind as we look at the final two models.

Two More Consulting Models: From Exploration to Adaptive Action

With that in mind – the consultant’s ability to frame the planning tool as a thinking aid, rather than a prediction machine, and to use the right language – here are the last two thinking models to use with clients navigating uncertainty.

Consulting in Uncertain Times Model 3: Create Safe Exploration Zones

Premortems, scenario planning, hypothesis testing, 90-day decision reviews

  • Uncertainty often shuts down creative thinking. People become risk-averse, conversations become guarded, and the organization stops exploring the options that might actually lead forward.
  • Your role: Create structured environments where exploration feels safe — where the team can examine difficult possibilities without triggering defensiveness or premature commitment.
  • Premortems: Ask the team to imagine the initiative has failed. What caused it? This surfaces risks that optimism tends to hide — and does so before the commitment is made.
  • Scenario planning: Develop two or three plausible futures (not best/worst, but genuinely different). For each, ask: what would we wish we had done? Then work backward to the present.
  • Hypothesis testing: Treat decisions as experiments rather than commitments. Define a small, time-bound test. What would we need to see in 60 days to know this is working?
  • 90-day decision reviews: Build in formal review points so decisions are revisited with current information rather than defended past their usefulness.
  • The consulting insight: Safe exploration is not about avoiding risk. It is about making risk visible, discussable, and manageable — which is exactly what uncertain environments require.

Consulting in Uncertain Times Model 4: Normalize Adaptive Planning

Plans aren’t promises — they are hypotheses to test

  • Many leadership teams hold an implicit belief that changing a plan signals failure. As a result, they stay committed to strategies that are no longer serving them, because changing course feels like an admission of error.
  • Your role: Help clients develop a healthier relationship with planning — one that treats plans as living tools rather than binding commitments.
  • In practice: Introduce language that normalizes iteration. “We made our best decision with the information we had. Here’s what we’ve learned. Here’s how we’re adapting.” This frames revision as competence, not weakness.
  • Help the team distinguish between the goal (which should remain stable) and the path (which should remain flexible). You can be deeply committed to an outcome while holding the method lightly.
  • The consulting insight: Adaptive planning is not the same as having no plan. It is having a plan strong enough to withstand revision — and a team confident enough to make it.

The Consultant’s Role: A Steady Presence in the Storm

Uncertainty is not going away. If anything, the research suggests it is becoming our permanent operating environment. The question is not whether our clients will face it — it is whether we are prepared to help them navigate it with skill.

These four models are not formulas. They are frameworks for creating the conditions in which better thinking becomes possible. And better thinking, consistently applied, leads to better decisions — even when the future refuses to cooperate.

That is what we offer. Not certainty. Not prediction. The disciplined, structured, human capacity to think clearly under pressure — and to bring our clients with us.

In a world that is offering a great deal of uncertainty right now, that is a valuable thing to be.

Thank you for reading — and for contributing your voice and experience throughout this series. The responses woven into Parts 2 and 3 reminded me of one of the things I value most about IMC: we are a community of practitioners who learn from each other. That, in itself, is a model for navigating uncertainty.

Let’s Keep the Consultant’s Role in Uncertain Times Conversation Going

The conversation doesn’t have to end here. If these models sparked ideas, questions, or stories you’d like to continue exploring, I’d welcome the chance to dig deeper — in a future article, a virtual peer group session, or a direct conversation. Reach out and let’s keep thinking together.

Send your response to: [email protected]

Reference: Empson, L. & Howard-Grenville, J. (November 2024). How to Lead When the Future Feels Unpredictable. Harvard Business Review.

Read Part 1 of 3, When the Ground Shifts: Recognizing Uncertainty in Your Client’s Organization

Read Part 2 of 3, Steady in the Storm: The First Two Thinking Models

About the Author Jeannette Hobson CMC

Jeannette Hobson, CMC, is an executive coach and Vistage Chair with nearly 30 years of experience helping CEOs and leadership teams perform at their highest levels. She is a member and Board Director of IMC USA and a contributor to its strategic planning and community initiatives. She can be reached at [email protected].

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *